Goodyear recalling certain Wrangler Silent Armor tires

Goodyear is voluntarily recalling 40,915 Wrangler Silent Armor light truck tires in the U.S. and Canada produced during a 14-week period in 2009 because of the potential for a partial tread area separation in those tires subjected to “certain severe usage conditions.”

The sizes being recalled—LT235/80R17 LRE; LT325/60R18 LRE; LT275/70R18 LRE; LT265/70R17 LRE; LT245/75R17 LRE; and LT285/70R17 LRD—were produced from the ninth week of 2009 through the 22nd week of 2009 (March 31-May 31) at Goodyear’s Fayetteville, N.C., plant, the company said. The tires being recalled are identified by the tire plant code PJ and the date codes 0909 through 2209. Goodyear estimates there might be as many as 27,000 of the target tires still in operation in the U.S. and Canada.

Goodyear said it intially observed slightly increased levels of warranty returns and property claims starting in May 2010 and continued to monitor early warning data for these tires and conducted inspections of several returned tires.

After receiving an injury claim involving one of the tires in the third quarter of 2011, Goodyear said its inspection of the tire revealed damage due to stone drilling and other external road-hazard damage. The company said it found no safety issues but determined in the interest of customer satisfaction to recall the tires identified above.

Goodyear said it will notify owners and replace the tires free of charge; the recall is expected to begin on or before March 22. Customers who previously may have received an adjustment on any of the recalled population of tires will be offered reimbursement on a pro-rated basis.

Owners may contact Goodyear at 800-592-3267 or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) at 888-327-4236 for more information.

Source: http://www.tirebusiness.com/


Tire Rack's Recommended Installers are your installation solution. You can drop-ship to their location, too! Gift ideas under $50 in Tire Rack's Automotive Gift Guide.




Get Six Pack Abdominals-Click Here!

Consensus needed on tire aging

Is a properly cared-for tire any more unsafe if it is 10 years old than if it is six years old? What about a well-cared for tire that’s three years old vs. one that is newly made?

That’s really the issue in the latest effort by a state legislature, this time in Maryland, to force tire manufacturers and distributors to affix a label on each tire they sell, giving the month and year of manufacture.

What makes this type of proposed legislation so vexing is that there is no agreement within the tire and auto industries on when a tire should be pulled from use. Some auto companies say six years, some tire companies say 10 years, and still others make no tire-age recommendations at all.

It’s no wonder legislators periodically come up with proposals to address this issue, especially after someone in their district, for example, has an accident that supposedly involved an older tire—even if that tire wasn’t properly maintained. Let’s face it: Tires are an easy target.

Until tire companies, auto makers and the tire industry as a whole come to some agreement on when, or even if, there is an age limit on tires, bills like the one in Maryland will continue to spring up. Then the tire industry will do whatever it can to make sure it doesn’t get passed, especially because it is an issue that doesn’t seem to be a problem.

The latest bill tackling tire age limits was introduced in the Mary¬land House a few weeks ago by Del¬egate Benjamin F. Kramer, D-19th District, who maintains that tires more than six-years old pose a safety hazard.

Speaking at a recent hearing on Maryland House Bill 729, Mr. Kramer expressed skepticism about testimony presented by tire industry representatives and played down the significance of studies performed by the Rubber Manufacturers Association that indicated the claims rate for tires does not increase with age.

The delegate chose, instead, to focus on internal studies undertaken by Ford Motor Co. that led the auto maker to recommend tire replacement after six years.

What’s at stake is more than simply slapping a label on a tire.

Even if there is no difference in the safety of a newer tire vs. an older one, most people, if given the chance, will opt for the newest model. That will prove to be an inventory nightmare for the manufacturers and distributors of tires.

Tire dealers, based on the proposed legislation, also would be required to provide consumers with the date-of-manufacture information on a receipt or invoice as well as written disclosures about the dangers of tire aging. They would have to give a copy to consumers and keep the originals for three years. Fines would be levied for those failing to follow the letter of the law.

All of this is over an issue of which there is no industry consensus, and where the data show that tire aging is a minimal public safety issue, at worst.

If the tire industry wants to quash future proposed legislation on this subject, it must decide whether there is an age limit for tires and if so, what that limit is or isn't.

Hopefully, that would end the debate once and for all.

Source: http://www.tirebusiness.com/


Tire Rack's Recommended Installers are your installation solution. You can drop-ship to their location, too! Gift ideas under $50 in Tire Rack's Automotive Gift Guide.




Get Six Pack Abdominals-Click Here!

Great Article To Understand Why You Should Not Substitute Your Tire With A Lower Speed Rating (Load Too!)

Here's a great article from AGCO Automotive about Tire Speed Ratings. If you live in their area, give them a try! They are very knowledgeable and informative, two things that can't be beat in the automotive industry!


Can I Substitute A Lower Speed Rated Tire

Tire speed rating is extremely important to handling and braking, yet it may be one of the most misunderstood tire ratings.
For many, the first introduction to speed rating is in buying tires. The tire salesperson may ask, is that "H" or "V" rated? Unfortunately, many tire salespeople have little understanding of what the rating means other than one cost more than the other. It’s "just" the speed rating, is a very poor and incomplete answer.

When an engineer designs the suspension for a vehicle, the tires are a major consideration. Many factors are considered before a tire is specified. One major factor, relating to handling and braking is centrifugal distortion. This is the amount the tire distorts when subjected to speed, braking or handling. With more belting and the better quality, there is less distortion. This is important, as the design of the suspension and brakes partially determine the centrifugal load on the tires.

The method used to decide resistance to centrifugal distortion is a speed test, and the rating is known as a speed rating. Tires are tested by spinning them at speed, until they fail. The greater the speed of failure the higher the rating.

The lowest rated tires, usually used on automobiles, are "S" rated. This rating means the tire is safe for 112 MPH. The next rating is "T" and then "U" and so on. The better the tire is constructed, the higher the speed of failure. This is also the source of many misunderstandings. The speed rating does not imply how fast the vehicle will be driven; it expresses the characteristics of the tire.

Speed rating relates to distortion of the tire under a load and not just how fast the vehicle is driven

For instance, when the steering is turned, on a vehicle traveling at speed, centrifugal force distorts the tire, in the direction of travel. Friction of the contact patch determines control of the vehicle. The more belting in the tire, the less distortion and the better the vehicle will handle. Similar forces also act on tires during braking.

Under normal conditions, most tires can withstand loads placed on them by the suspension. In an emergency maneuver, the proper tire is necessary to withstand the increased load.

Handling and braking is extremely important to most people. Engineering that goes into the vehicle largely determines this. Engineers specify the speed rating required for good reason and place the information on the vehicle and in the owner’s manual.

Never install a tire, rated lower than the vehicle calls for

Placing a higher rated tire, than is required, is not necessary but will generally increase the handling and braking of many vehicles. Substituting an underrated tire, may save a few dollars. It may also cost the driver far more than can ever be saved.


Source: http://www.agcoauto.com/

Tire Rack's Recommended Installers are your installation solution. You can drop-ship to their location, too!
Gift ideas under $50 in Tire Rack's Automotive Gift Guide.

Toyo extends Extensa recall to Canada

Tire Business staff report
RICHMOND, British Columbia (Jan. 27, 2012) — Toyo Tire Canada Inc. is recalling approximately 1,884 Toyo Extensa A/S tires sold in Canada since September 2009 because of a possible manufacturing problem that could lead to cracks in the bead area and potentially to tire failure.
The recall is an extension of one disclosed earlier this week by Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. involving approximately 68,763 Extensa A/S tires sold in the U.S.
The tires being recalled are from Toyo’s plant in White, Ga., during a period starting in the 38th week of 2009 and lasting through the 44th week of 2010, Toyo said.
The tires are identified by the Tire Indentification Number (TIN) 3809 to 4410, molded into tire’s sidewall.
Toyo said it determined that a select number of these tires were produced with a kink in the bead area. Under certain circumstances, the tire maker said, the kink eventually could lead to a crack in the bead area, which if left undetected could cause the tire to fail.
The company stressed that Extensas made in Japan or China are not being recalled. Toyo’s White plant has the Department of Transportation identification code 73.
Toyo said there has been only one report of air loss in the U.S. and no reports of accidents related to this condition.
Richmond-based Toyo Tire Canada is offering consumers with the identified tires free replacements. Consumers can check a dedicated web page for more information, or call a toll-free hotline, 877-682-8696.
Toyo will notify all consumers directly who registered their tires.
The firm said the replacement offer is valid through May 31.

Source: http://www.tirebusiness.com/

Toyo recalling 68,763 Extensa A/S tires

Tire Business staff report
CYPRESS, Calif. (Jan. 25, 2012) — Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. is voluntarily recalling approximately 68,763 Toyo Extensa A/S tires because of a possible manufacturing problem that could lead to cracks in the bead area and potentially to tire failure.
The tires being recalled are size P225/60R16 97T made at Toyo’s plant in White, Ga., during a period starting in the 38th week of 2009 and lasting through the 44th week of 2010, Toyo said. The tires are identified by the Tire Indentification Number (TIN) 3809 to 4410, molded into tire’s sidewall. Toyo said it determined that a select number of these tires were produced with a kink in the bead area. Under certain circumstances, the tire maker said, the kink eventually could led to a crack in the bead area, which if left undetected could cause the tire to fail.
The company stressed that Extensas made in Japan or China are not being recalled. Toyo’s White plant has the Department of Transportation identification code 73.
Toyo said there has been only one report of air loss and no reports of accidents related to this condition.
Toyo is offering consumers with the identified tires free replacements. Consumers can check a dedicated web page for more information, or call a toll-free hotline, 800-442-8696.
Toyo will notify all consumers directly who registered their tires.
The firm said the replacement offer is valid through May 31.

Source: http://www.tirebusiness.com/